Speak with a Partner

content-image

John W. Sleeting

Managing Partner – Family Office Services

Start a Conversation

content-image

Karie M. OConnor,
CIMA®, CPFA®, AIFA®, QKA®

Director – Institutional Advisory Services

Speak with a Partner

content-image

Jeffrey P. DeHaan, CFP®

Managing Partner – Private Wealth Management

Navigating Social Security: A Case Study Assessing Options for Couples

Kevin Nolte August 01, 2023

Making informed decisions about when to claim Social Security benefits is crucial for couples to maximize their retirement income. The optimal claiming strategy depends on various factors, including each spouse’s earned benefit, ages, and their ability to invest excess Social Security income. This case study explores three scenarios to show how and when the math changes on benefit maximization.

Case Study 1:

In this scenario, we examine a single-income household with the following details::

Ages: Both 67, Full Retirement Age (FRA)

Monthly Benefit Amount: Him – $3,423 at FRA, $4,206 at 70. Her – $500 at FRA, $615 at 70

Options assessed: Both claiming at age 67 (blue line) vs the lower earner claiming at 67 and higher earner at 70 (orange line). Note that since the lower earner’s benefit is below 50% of the higher earner’s, they will receive the Spousal Benefit, increasing their income to 50% of the higher earner’s.

You may have heard the general school of thought “the breakeven point on delaying Social Security is in your early 80s, so if you expect to live longer than that, you should wait to claim”. This scenario perfectly aligns with that generalization, which is shown by the intersection of the two possible options at age 82.

Case Study 2:

This case is very similar to the first scenario, but now we have two high earners, and neither will be eligible for the spousal benefit. All facts are the same except the lower earning spouse now has a benefit of $3,125 at 67, and $3,840 at 70. Because of that change, it is now appropriate to consider having both individuals delay until age 70.

Again, like the first case, the intersection of all three options is at age 82, which agrees with conventional wisdom.

What if, however, this couple has a large nest egg and does not need to spend their benefit and can invest it, earning 5%? The below chart shows the same exact scenario as the previous one but assumes that all proceeds are invested and earn 5%.

Now, the intersection of the three lines is at age 92, indicating that claiming earlier may be the better option if the benefit amount can be invested instead of spent.

Case Study 3:

As the previous example showed, when factoring in investment returns the general rules of waiting to claim begin to fall apart. Another factor that also changes the calculation is differing spousal ages. In this example, we return to the same facts as Case 1, but change the lower earner’s age to 55, while the higher earner’s remains at 67.

In this scenario, the intersection is when the husband and wife are ages 82 and 70 respectively. Beyond the intersection occurring earlier, when the higher earning spouse passes (at age 95 in this simulation), the lower earning spouse has their benefit increased to match the higher earner’s benefit. This means that if both individuals live to age 95, the younger spouse will receive 12 more years at the increased age 70 benefit.

Conclusion:

Determining the best claiming strategy for Social Security benefits is a nuanced process that requires careful consideration of individual circumstances. While general rules provide a starting point, the case studies highlight the significant impact of several factors. For a personal assessment of your own Social Security benefit strategy contact the Clearwater Capital Partners Planning Team or consult your CCP Advisor.

Kevin Nolte

disclosure

THIS COMMENTARY HAS BEEN PREPARED BY CLEARWATER CAPITAL PARTNERS. THE OPINIONS VOICED IN THIS MATERIAL ARE FOR GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED TO PROVIDE OR BE CONSTRUED AS PROVIDING LEGAL, ACCOUNTING, OR SPECIFIC INVESTMENT ADVICE OR RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL. ALL ECONOMIC DATA IS DERIVED FROM PUBLIC SOURCES BELIEVED TO BE RELIABLE. TO DETERMINE WHICH INVESTMENTS MAY BE APPROPRIATE FOR YOU, PLEASE CONSULT WITH US PRIOR TO INVESTING. INVESTING INVOLVES RISK WHICH MAY INCLUDE LOSS OF PRINCIPAL.

This material is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, insurance products, or to adopt any investment strategy. The opinions expressed are as of the date of writing and may change as subsequent conditions vary. The information and opinions contained in this material are derived from proprietary and nonproprietary sources deemed by Clearwater Capital Partners to be reliable, are not necessarily all-inclusive and are not guaranteed as to accuracy. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. Reliance upon information in this material is at the sole discretion of the reader. Investment involves risks. International investing involves additional risks, including risks related to foreign currency, limited liquidity, less government regulation and the possibility of substantial volatility due to adverse political, economic or other developments. Index performance is shown for illustrative purposes only. You cannot invest directly in an index. S&P 500 is a registered trademark of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services, a division of S&P Global (“S&P”)  DOW JONES, DJ, DJIA and DOW JONES INDUSTRIAL AVERAGE are registered trademarks of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings (“Dow Jones”). The two main risks related to fixed-income investing are interest rate risk and credit risk. Typically, when interest rates rise, there is a corresponding decline in the market value of bonds. Credit risk refers to the possibility that the issuer of the bond will not be able to make principal and interest payments.

"*" indicates required fields

Schedule Your First Meeting


Name*